Page 66 - vol.49

VOL.49 廠務季刊 台南、熊本、新竹、高雄多場址的地震土壤結構互制特製方案比較

結論 參考文獻

近年，台積公司興建新廠勢必將持續面臨山坡地、河 01. Kausel, Eduardo.“Early History of Soil‒
谷、池塘或火山沉積層等地質條件較困難之廠址，為 structure Interaction.”Soil Dynamics and
降低廠址發生地震時之地表加速度與位移反應，可利 Earthquake Engineering 30, no. 9(2010).
用土壤結構動態互制分析，並搭配工程方法改善廠址
02. John P. Wolf,“Dynamic soil-structure
先天劣勢。統整南科、日本熊本、高雄及新竹寶山四
interaction”(1985).
處不同廠址土壤結構互制分析結論如下：
03. Lysmer, J.,“Analytical Procedures in Soil
➀ 廠址淺層土壤軟弱，基樁提供承載力的同時，搭配 Dynamics,”Report No. EERC 78-29, Earthquake
浮動樁或壁樁可降低地震放大倍率，達減震效果。 Engineering Research Center, University of
California, Berkeley, December(1978).
➁ 若基樁與基礎版為剛性連結，則基樁樁徑增加有助
04. Lysmer, J. and Savage, E.,“Flexible Volume
於減震成效的提升，然而仍須考量基樁的施工性與
Substructuring for Seismic Analysis,”(draft),
經濟性一併評估。
University of California, Berkeley(1978).
➂ 基礎版厚增厚，可有效提升減震效果。
05. Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J., and Seed, H.
➃ 廠址若選在山坡地形，回填土廠址整平可能使地震 Bolton,“SHAKE: A Computer Program for
放大，若搭配基樁可有效低地震放大倍率，達減震 Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally
效果。 Layered Sites,”ERRC Report, University of
California, Berkeley,(1972).
➄ 結構物增設壁樁或連續壁，可減少高頻內涵之地震
下放大倍率，惟需考慮壁樁或連續壁之施工工期、 06. Idriss, I. M., and Sun, J. I.,“SHAKE91-A
現地施工性與經濟性。 Computer Program for Conducting Equivalent
Linear Seismic Response Analyses of the
Horizontally Layered Soil Deposit,”University
of California,(1992).

07. Lysmer, J. ; “SASSI2000-Theoretical Manual”
; Revision 1, Geotechnical Engineering,
University of California, Berkeley(1999).

08. Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss,“Soil Moduli
and Damping Factors for Dynamic Response
Analysis,”EERC Report, University of
California,(1970).
09. Lysmer, J. , Seed, H. B.,“Site-
dependent spectra for earthquake-resistant
design”(1976).
10. Lysmer, J.；Ostadan, F.；Tabatabaie,
M.；Vahdani, S. and Tarjirian, F.；“SASSI-A
System for Analysis of Soil-Structure
Interaction”；University of California,
Berkeley(1981).ｃ.

��